The U.S. Supreme Court's Characterizations of the Press: An Empirical Study

The erosion of constitutional norms in the United States is at center an urgent national debate. Among most crucial these issues fragile and deteriorating relationship between press government. While scholars have responded with sophisticated examinations legislators’ President’s characterizations news media, one branch government has received little scrutiny—the U.S. Supreme Court. This gap scholarship remarkable light Court’s role as very institution entrusted safeguarding rights press. paper presents findings first comprehensive empirical examination depictions We tracked every reference to by a Court Justice opinions since 1784. coded references (broadly defined Justices themselves) for presence common frames whether frame was conveyed positive, negative, or neutral tone. results our study reveal troubling trends Court, widespread implications any discussion contemporary freedom. find that there been stark deterioration both quantity quality across variety measures. Our data show are now less likely talk about than they were past, that, when do, it more often negative light. At this moment, we seen risks executive legislative attacks on press, finds not pushing back. also reveals substantial correlation ideology Justices’ attitudes toward It likewise illuminates press-characterizing behaviors least press-friendly all time currently sitting Justices, providing insights into patterns might be expected years come.